Rules of reviewing and publishing of the articles in the scientific magazine “Bulletin of the Kuzbass Institute” (according to the Provision on the scientific magazine “Bulletin of the Kuzbass Institute” approved by the order of KI of the FPS of Russia of 03.03.2015 No. 79)
The responsible secretary of an editorial board after receiving issued according to the articles established by rules directs them for reviewing.
Reviewers, as a rule, are associate editors. In some cases according to the decision of the chairman of an editorial board or his deputy other experts can be reviewers. As the reviewer at least one expert having an academic degree on scientific specialty, the corresponding branch of science presented in article can act. In some cases at publication of the materials which are directly connected with practical aspects of the studied question, the reviewer the expert without academic degree (academic status) having experience (services) on senior positions of high level in the sphere which is a studying subject in the reviewed article can be.
The reviewer prepares the review according to , the approved order of institute where estimates the scientific level of the presented article and makes the decision on the publication of article or on its deviation. By preparation of the review the reviewer as priority criteria of a reception/deviation of materials is guided by requirements of items 11 and 18 of Provision on the scientific magazine “Bulletin of theKuzbass Institute”.
Can form the bases to motivated refusal of an editorial board of the magazine in publication of article:
discrepancy of article to headings of the magazine (item 18 of Provision on the scientific magazine ”Bulletin of the Kuzbass Institute”);
discrepancy to requirements imposed to the materials represented to publication (according to the section VI of Provision on the scientific magazine “Bulletin of the Kuzbass Institute”);
existence in article: the data which are state or other secret which is specially protected by the law; the materials which are containing public appeals to implementation of terrorist activity or publicly justifying terrorism, other extremist materials; the materials propagandizing a pornography, a cult of violence and cruelty; the materials containing obscene abuse; data on ways, methods of development, production and use, places of acquisition of drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors, promotion of any advantages of use of separate drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs and precursors; the data containing instructions on self-made production of explosives and explosive devices; other information which distribution is forbidden by federal laws.
In case of a deviation of materials the review is sent to the author by e-mail.
The vice-chairman of an editorial board – the editor-in-chief carries out the general reviewing of the issue of the magazine.
After the general reviewing of the issue of the magazine the vice-chairman of an editorial board – the editor-in-chief gives a ready dummy of the magazine to the chairman of an editorial board. The chairman of an editorial board makes a final decision on the publication of the issue of the magazine and brings this decision to the vice-chairman of an editorial board – the editor-in-chief.
On the basis of the approved dummy the responsible secretary of an editorial board forms a fair dummy of the magazine and transfers him to the editor of organizational and scientific and publishing office of institute for final reading of the manuscript and the press of the issue of the magazine in printing house.